Sister Leticia Ugboaja was walking to Sunday Mass in McAllen, Texas, wearing her religious habit and carrying little more than her rosary and cellphone when two armed men approached her. She had been thinking about the day’s Bible readings. Instead of reaching Our Lady of Sorrows Church, she was taken into the custody of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement.
Ugboaja said she went into a cold sweat because she did not understand what was happening to her. She begged the officers to let her attend Mass and receive Holy Communion before they took her away. They refused. For a Catholic sister whose ministry includes serving as an Extraordinary Minister of Holy Communion, the denial was not a minor disruption to her schedule. It severed her from the worship she had been walking toward and placed her under armed federal control without a clear explanation of why she was being detained.
Ugboaja had built a full life of service in South Texas long before ICE interrupted her walk to church. The 56-year-old member of the Daughters of Mary Mother of Mercy is a registered nurse at South Texas Health System and a longtime healthcare worker who previously spent about a decade as a certified nursing assistant in Edinburg. She served her parish, cared for patients, held permission to work in the United States, and had complied with the immigration requirements imposed on her, according to her attorney. Her nursing career, ministry, and community service show the full life ICE disrupted while the government still retained the power to take her away.
The legal history behind her detention makes that power more disturbing. In 2019, an immigration judge denied Ugboaja’s asylum application but granted her protection from removal to Nigeria because the judge found she was likely to face torture there, according to her attorney, Carlos M. Garcia. That order protected her from removal to Nigeria, but it did not keep ICE from detaining her or the government from reportedly pursuing removal to another country.
Garcia said the government planned to remove Ugboaja to a third country instead. No destination was publicly identified. The reported plan exposed the narrowness of the protection she had spent years living under: one route back to danger had been closed, but the machinery of detention and removal remained active around her. ICE could still take her into custody, separate her from her community, and pursue another destination.
This is how legal protection can exist on paper without producing actual security. A person may win recognition that returning them to one country could expose them to torture, follow every reporting requirement, maintain work authorization, build a career, and serve a community—yet still remain within reach of officers who can interrupt an ordinary walk to church and place them back in government custody.
Ugboaja received little explanation when ICE detained her, according to her attorney. Sister Norma Pimentel, who spoke with Ugboaja during the detention, said she was distressed and needed medication that officers did not allow her to retrieve. Custody came first, while clarity, medication, worship, and the life she had been living became secondary.
Her detention became public because her parish sounded the alarm. Church officials posted about what had happened, the story spread, and members of Congress representing South Texas contacted federal officials. Ugboaja was released several hours later and returned home.
That sequence should not be mistaken for a system correcting itself. ICE had already detained her. Her release followed rapid parish attention, legal advocacy, news coverage, and intervention by elected officials. Outside pressure helped secure her freedom after ICE had already taken it away.
Most people taken into immigration custody do not have that level of institutional force gathering around their names within hours. They may not have a parish capable of generating public pressure, a lawyer immediately explaining their legal protection, or members of Congress calling federal officials. Their compliance may be just as extensive, their fear just as real, and their legal vulnerability just as severe, but their detention may remain invisible.
Ugboaja understood that imbalance when she spoke publicly for the first time after her release. She did not use the news conference only to describe what ICE had done to her. She spoke about people with some form of legal protection who follow every rule demanded of them and still live in uncertainty. Gratitude toward those who helped free her, she said, did not require silence about what happened or about what continues to happen to others.
Her decision to speak changes the center of the story. The defining fact is not simply that she returned home after several hours. Federal officers detained a woman protected from removal to Nigeria during an ordinary act of worship while the government reportedly pursued removal to a third country.
The denial of Mass and Communion made the interruption visible, but the harm extended beyond her religious life. ICE detained a woman who had complied with government requirements, held permission to work, built a nursing career, and served her community. None of that gave her security when the government placed her back in custody; public visibility, legal advocacy, parish intervention, and political pressure helped secure her release that day.
That is the broader warning carried by her case. Under a deportation system that keeps searching for another removal route, protection from one country can leave a person exposed to another. Compliance can become a permanent cycle of check-ins without security. Her case shows how freedom can hinge on whether a detention becomes visible quickly enough for lawyers, institutions, reporters, and elected officials to intervene.
Sister Leticia Ugboaja was able to stand inside her church weeks later and describe what ICE did because her detention became impossible to ignore. The people she spoke for remain inside the same machinery without a parish campaign, a press conference, a lawyer beside them, or a member of Congress forcing the government to answer.
Sister Leticia Ugboaja had court protection from removal to Nigeria, permission to work, and a record of compliance. ICE still detained her and reportedly prepared to remove her to another country. Her release followed public attention and political intervention that many immigrants never receive.
Upgrade to a paid subscription to support independent reporting that documents ICE detention and deportation power, centers the people harmed, and keeps invisible cases in the public record.
