Becca Good wants Renee’s Honda Pilot returned. Federal officials say there is no criminal civil-rights investigation — but they still refuse to release the vehicle.
That is the absurdity of it. If the government says there is no criminal civil-rights investigation, then holding Renee Good’s car starts looking less like evidence control and more like state seizure without accountability.
That’s the question people keep circling, and it’s exactly where things don’t add up.
If there’s no active federal case, holding the vehicle starts to look less like standard evidence handling and more like control over what the public can see, test, or challenge. A judge has already had to step in to force evidence to be turned over, which tells you this isn’t moving in a normal, transparent way.
That is the extra cruelty: the killing was not the end of the harm. Holding Renee Good’s car keeps the family trapped in the aftermath while the government refuses a straight answer.
That is what it looks like. If there is no active investigation, holding Renee Good’s car stops looking like evidence preservation and starts looking like control of the record.
That is the pressure point. Either the car holds evidence that matters, or the government is keeping Renee Good’s property without justification. Both answers point back to accountability.
It becomes obstruction when evidence is controlled but accountability never arrives. Families are left waiting while the institutions that caused the harm control what the public gets to see.
ICE is still holding that car because cruelty, control, and impunity are the point, and too many people still refuse to call that harm what it is. When the government can take from a grieving family and face no consequences, the answer is already right in front of us.
If the federal government says there is no investigation, then the state should not be standing back while Renee Good’s car is still being held. At some point, refusing to act becomes part of the cover.
That is the contradiction. Officials cannot claim there is nothing to investigate while still holding the vehicle like evidence. If the car matters enough to keep, then the public deserves answers.
File a grand theft auto complaint?
That is the absurdity of it. If the government says there is no criminal civil-rights investigation, then holding Renee Good’s car starts looking less like evidence control and more like state seizure without accountability.
it is evidence control; it's deliberately withholding the evidence from state prosecutors…
So Minnesota law enforcement cannot use it as evidence?
That’s the question people keep circling, and it’s exactly where things don’t add up.
If there’s no active federal case, holding the vehicle starts to look less like standard evidence handling and more like control over what the public can see, test, or challenge. A judge has already had to step in to force evidence to be turned over, which tells you this isn’t moving in a normal, transparent way.
Good question
Shooting her in the face
Isn’t good enough
We must inconvenience the family
That is the extra cruelty: the killing was not the end of the harm. Holding Renee Good’s car keeps the family trapped in the aftermath while the government refuses a straight answer.
And why have so many cars showing up at auction lately in our local weekly? I guess it’s hard to make the payments when you’re in a camp.
You're a quack! Go home to Mommy.
Exactly.
Because it carries evidence of a crime, that's why.
Exactly 💯
What crime? They executed her, and she committed NO CRIME.
Um, it's the Ice officer that committed the crime…
To cover up the truth.
That is what it looks like. If there is no active investigation, holding Renee Good’s car stops looking like evidence preservation and starts looking like control of the record.
Well said
Agree 💯
Because they have something to hide
I asked that same question months ago, the car is evidence. AND, when is Renee Goods killer going to be indicted?
It’s evidence in a murder investigation….eventually.
That is the contradiction. They say there is no investigation, but they are still holding the car like the record inside it matters.
Because the impacts of the bullets reveal direction, number and force of each.
The car is not incidental property. The bullet impacts can show where the shots came from, how many were fired, and what the government already knows.
SHOOTO
Sometimes I sit and cry. I miss her so much. The horrific murder is so obvious, yet the government is complicit in it. Renee is an American hero.
They have the vehicle and know that it contains forensic inculpatory evidence… otherwise they would release it.
That is the pressure point. Either the car holds evidence that matters, or the government is keeping Renee Good’s property without justification. Both answers point back to accountability.
The usual, obstruction of justice.
It becomes obstruction when evidence is controlled but accountability never arrives. Families are left waiting while the institutions that caused the harm control what the public gets to see.
Concealing the evidence
Exactly. If there is no investigation, keeping the car makes even less sense.
That is not closure — that is evidence control.
Anyone not knowing the answer to why, needs remediation
ICE is still holding that car because cruelty, control, and impunity are the point, and too many people still refuse to call that harm what it is. When the government can take from a grieving family and face no consequences, the answer is already right in front of us.
Why isn't the state taking control of this?
That is the question.
If the federal government says there is no investigation, then the state should not be standing back while Renee Good’s car is still being held. At some point, refusing to act becomes part of the cover.
Simple answer bullet hole trajectories and evidence to be used to sue, the United States government for her murder. Disgusting beyond belief!
That is the contradiction. Officials cannot claim there is nothing to investigate while still holding the vehicle like evidence. If the car matters enough to keep, then the public deserves answers.