Corrections Policy
How Americans Against ICE corrects factual errors, handles updates, and preserves transparency in the public record.
Last updated: August 9, 2026
Purpose
Americans Against ICE is committed to factual accuracy, transparency, and accountability in its reporting on immigration enforcement, detention, deportation, government conduct, and the people and communities affected by those systems.
When a substantive error is identified, we correct it promptly and clearly. Corrections are intended to preserve the integrity of the public record, not erase the fact that an error occurred.
What We Correct
We correct material factual errors involving names, dates, locations, quotations, statistics, legal proceedings, government actions, public records, source attribution, or other information that could materially affect a reader’s understanding of a report.
Minor typographical, grammatical, formatting, or stylistic changes that do not alter the meaning of an article may be corrected without a formal correction notice.
Corrections
When a published article contains a substantive factual error, Americans Against ICE will correct the inaccurate information and add a correction notice when appropriate.
A correction notice should explain what information was incorrect and what has been corrected.
We do not silently remove substantive errors when doing so would obscure the history of the published record.
Updates
Reporting can develop after publication.
New court filings, government records, official statements, identification of individuals, additional documentation, or other material developments may require an article to be updated.
When new information materially changes or expands the reporting, an update notice may be added identifying the significant new information.
An update is not necessarily a correction. Accurate reporting may require additional information as events develop.
Allegations, Charges, and Findings
Americans Against ICE distinguishes allegations from established facts.
Claims made in lawsuits, complaints, testimony, interviews, government filings, advocacy reports, or other sources are attributed accordingly.
An arrest, accusation, investigation, or charge is not described as a conviction or final finding unless the public record establishes that outcome.
When the status of a case materially changes, published reporting may be updated to reflect the new record.
Source and Attribution Corrections
If information is attributed to the wrong person, organization, document, government agency, publication, or public record, the attribution will be corrected.
When a quotation has been materially misquoted or presented in a way that changes its meaning, the quotation or surrounding context will be corrected.
Headlines, Captions, and Visual Material
Corrections are not limited to article text.
Material inaccuracies appearing in headlines, subtitles, image captions, graphics, embedded media, or other editorial elements may also be corrected.
Removing Published Material
Americans Against ICE generally does not remove accurate reporting merely because a person, agency, institution, company, or other subject objects to its publication.
Removal may be considered when publication creates a significant safety or privacy concern, exposes information that should not have been published, involves material that cannot be adequately corrected, or when another compelling editorial reason requires removal.
Reader Correction Requests
Readers, sources, subjects of reporting, attorneys, organizations, and public agencies may submit correction requests.
Requests should identify the article, the information believed to be inaccurate, the proposed correction, and supporting documentation or public records when available.
Correction requests may be sent to the publication’s designated contact email.
Editorial Independence
Correction decisions are made according to the factual record and our editorial standards.
Government agencies, political organizations, advertisers, donors, paid subscribers, advocacy organizations, sources, or subjects of reporting do not receive authority to determine whether accurate reporting is removed or changed.
AI-Assisted Tools
AI-assisted tools may support drafting, editing, research organization, formatting, or workflow, but they do not replace human review, source verification, editorial judgment, or responsibility for corrections.